[PEAK] PEAK Roadmap Update
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Wed May 24 17:44:22 EDT 2006
At 12:26 AM 5/25/2006 +0300, Niki wrote:
>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>After that, I'll be starting on a new PEAK-Rules project, whose purpose
>>will ultimately be to replace both RuleDispatch and PyProtocols, although
>>it won't do so immediately.
>Any chance for PEAK-Rules to support unregistering of overloads?
Yes, this is one of the requirements driving the desire for pluggable
engines, as some engines will be optimized for dynamic adds/removes, and
others will not be. RuleDispatch's monolithic engine is definitely not
optimized for unregistering things.
More information about the PEAK