[PEAK] An event system based on RuleDispatch
dangoor at gmail.com
Mon Apr 24 15:37:02 EDT 2006
On 4/24/06, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> At 09:26 PM 4/24/2006 +0200, Simon Belak wrote:
> >before() and after() are an event system in itself aren't they?
I hadn't used before() and after() before. They do, in fact, work just
fine. (Gotta love the interpreter for playing around with stuff like
> Yes. The principal limitation of RuleDispatch compared to a more
> traditional event system is that you can't *remove* subscribers.
I have wondered about the possibility of that kind of thing in the
past, but I've never had a real enough use case to mention it.
More information about the PEAK