[TransWarp] PEAK 0.5a2

[Ulrich Eck]

Am Mon, 2003-07-07 um 23.42 schrieb Phillip J. Eby:
> At 03:34 PM 6/20/03 -0400, Lateef Jackson wrote:
> 
> >It smells a lot more like J2EE than PEAK and is very Javaish.
> 
> My condolences.  ;)  Seriously, I find J2EE way more complex than it needs 
> to be, mainly because it is excessively vendor-driven.  Specs with lots of 
> "optional" bits are bad for interoperability.
> 
> 
> >         Is there an ongoing conversation about Python Middleware? Is 
> > there any
> >conversation about a spec? Unfortunatly I think that the J2EE spec gets in
> >way of devloping J2EE apps. However it keeps the options open for developers
> >so that alone makes it worth it. A spec for Python Middleware writen by
> >developers and not the Venders (specifically db venders) could be a really
> >sweeeeeet spec.
> 
> PEAK defines plenty of interfaces; you could consider them a spec of 
> sorts.  If you're thinking message-oriented middleware (ala JMS), you might 
> hook up here with Ulrich Eck, who wants to develop some MOMish interfaces 
> for PEAK.

Yep, still fighting with the JMS-Specs to make them easy enough to make
it fun using them ;-)

i'ld appreciate talks/shared efforts in this specific area .. 
the irc-channel (#peak on irc.freenode.net) would be the best place to
start i think ..

cu Ulrich

> _______________________________________________
> TransWarp mailing list
> TransWarp at eby-sarna.com
> http://www.eby-sarna.com/mailman/listinfo/transwarp